
Learning Object Metadata (LOM)
SREB-SCORE Initiative
What is digital learning content?
Simply defined, digital learning content is information for teaching and
learning that is provided electronically and viewed on a computer or similar
device. Digital learning content is comprised of text, images, sound or
video that is captured in a digital (contrasted with analog) file. The terms
“digital content,” “digital learning content” and “learning objects” are
often used interchangeably.
What are learning objects?
Learning objects are the specific chunks of information that make up the
digital learning content. They can be used and reused endlessly for teaching
and learning, like building blocks, and they possess many adaptable
characteristics that can extend many learning activities. (See
Principles of Effective Learning Objects, SREB, 2005.)
There are numerous variations of the definition; for
example, IEEE LOM v1.0 defines learning objects as any
entity - digital or non-digital - that may be used or reused for learning,
education or training.
What is learning object metadata?
Learning object metadata (LOM) is the information about a learning
object that enables it to be retrieved from a database. (Think in terms of a
library electronic catalog.) For example, there are nine metadata
elements in the SREB-SCORE initiative that describe a learning object.
Metadata may be located separately from the learning object it describes,
or it may be embedded within the object. An
increasing number of states and their education agencies are now collecting
learning content with embedded metadata in large, organized databases,
called “repositories.”
What is a repository?
A repository is a database located in a central place where data are
stored and maintained. Typically, a state will create a specific repository
for different education sectors, such as one for K-12 and another for higher
education. Although they are located in different places, repositories can
be “federated” (connected) and searched through a single transparent
database that maintains metadata only for searching them. This
enables states to share learning objects.
How do federated repositories work?
Federated repositories are those that share learning objects. A registry
of the participating repositories is maintained in one location and contains
metadata about the learning objects that each state is willing to share with
other states. The registry acts like a catalog of all of the learning
objects in all of the state repositories. An automated process continually
“harvests” the metadata from the repositories to keep the registry up to
date. Through this one-point entry, users (such as teachers) can locate
learning objects in all of the participating repositories and (depending on
the accompanying intellectual property rights) use this content in their
courses. This greatly expands the resources available to teachers and
students.
What are intellectual property rights?
Developers of digital learning content own the rights to the intangible
property they have created. The rights may lie with the institution that
funded the development of the content. These legal rights are noted in the
metadata.
What is SREB-SCORE?
SREB-SCORE (Sharable Content Object Repositories for Education) is an
initiative of the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) to help its 16
member states improve teaching and learning and achieve cost savings through
the use of shared digital learning content. Through SREB-SCORE,
participating SREB state educational agencies, schools, colleges and
universities are working together over the long term to create quality
digital learning content and share it through connected (federated) state
repositories (databases). SREB-SCORE is a K-20 initiative, which impacts
procedures outlined in this description.
Why is SREB-SCORE important to SREB states?
SREB-SCORE is a good idea for SREB states because the initiative:
establishes school and college relationships to create, license and
provide high-quality content;
provides cost-effective learning resources for K-20 by sharing
development costs among states;
reduces duplication of effort; and
increases faculty and student productivity.
Why is metadata important to SREB-SCORE participants?
Metadata is information about an object and can be physical or digital.
As the number of objects grows exponentially and our needs for learning
expand equally dramatically, the lack of information or metadata about
objects places a critical and fundamental constraint on our ability to
discover, manage and use objects. Therefore, metadata standards address the
problem by defining a structure for interoperable descriptions of learning
objects.
SREB-SCORE envisions a future of federated state repositories that enable
educators and other users in participating states to create and share vast
resources of digital learning content. The quality of the accompanying
metadata of the learning objects in these repositories directly relates to
the effectiveness of the retrieval and use of the content.
The use of metadata:
- provides controlled and structured descriptions for digital
learning objects through searchable attributes such as title, author,
keywords, date, location, description and
subject;
- facilitates organization and classification of information;
- facilitates discovery of relevant information;
- documents and tracks layers of intellectual property rights for
the modification or reproduction of digital objects and their multiple
versions, as well as the authenticity of version and provenance, and
- promotes and enables
interoperability.
How was SREB-SCORE developed?
The following metadata standards and guidelines were used as the
foundation for developing the SREB-SCORE initiative and are metadata
standards for a K-20 environment. Explanations of these components and how
they were used in this project are provided below.
The IMS Global Learning Consortium, IMS Meta-data Best Practice
Guide for IEEE 1484.12.1- 2002 Standard for Learning Object Metadata
IEEE: WG12: Learning Object Metadata and components of the LOM
v1.0 standard.
1484.12.1™ IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata (LOM),
Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata (July 2002); (The final
version is available for purchase from IEEE.)
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative
Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM)
CanCore Initiative: CanCore Learning Object Metadata
SCORM Sharable Courseware Object Reference Model
What is IMS Global Learning Consortium?
The IMS Global Learning Consortium is a nonprofit standards organization
that is concerned with establishing interoperability for learning systems
and learning content through collaborative support of standards, innovation
and best practices.
What is LOM v1.0?
This is a multi-part standard (with nine elements) that specifies
learning object metadata. The longer title is 1484.12.1 IEEE Standard for
Learning Object Metadata. IEEE Standards documents are developed by the
IEEE Standards Association. Use of an IEEE Standard is wholly voluntary. The
purpose of this standard is to facilitate search, evaluation, acquisition
and use of learning objects.
What is GEM?
Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM) provides access to educational
resources on the Web. GEM has developed a set of widely used standards used
for describing those resources. These standards are incorporated in the
SREB-SCORE initiative.
What is Dublin Core?
Originally created for libraries, the Dublin Core is an international
standard of 15 elements that facilitates discovery of electronic resources
on the Web.
LOM v1.0 is crosswalked (mapped) with GEM and DublinCore in SREB-SCORE.
Crosswalks permit searching across multiple databases (interoperability)
that use different schemas. LOM v1.0 is one schema, and Gateway to
Educational Materials (GEM) and Dublin Core are two others. Metadata
elements describe a learning object and are grouped into categories.
Particular emphasis is placed on the general description of the learning
object, technical requirements, educational and pedagogic characteristics,
intellectual property rights, and educational objectives as they relate to
both K-12 and postsecondary digital content. This interoperability is
accommodated through the crosswalk with GEM and Dublin Core and by utilizing
taxonomies specific to SREB member state education agencies.
A very important metadata element is the classification element, which
describes the educational objective of the learning object using taxonomies
of K-12 state standards and higher education course numbers (or some other
classification system used by a higher education agency). This enables users
to locate digital content specific to the course they are teaching.
Who developed the SREB-SCORE metadata?
The group of persons who joined together to develop this metadata
resource for the SREB-SCORE initiative was composed of metadata librarians,
instructional design leaders, digital content specialists, an eLMS/repository
developer, a specialist in reusable content and technical standards, a
multimedia developer and other key persons in SREB states.
Leaders in this effort are Susan Henderson, associate executive director,
Florida Distance Learning Consortium; Cathy Alfano, project manager, The
Orange Grove Digital Repository; Liz Glowa, K-12 instructional consultant,
SREB-SCORE Initiative; Priscilla Caplan, assistant director for Digital
Library Services, Florida Center for Library Automation, University of
Florida; Judy Brown, former executive director, Academic ADL Co-Lab; Wil
Hawk, specialist, Maryland Virtual Learning Opportunities, Maryland State
Department of Education; Marie Lasseter, project manager, Learning Resource
Management, University System of Georgia Board of Regents; June Weis, SREB
research associate; Rose Flynn, multimedia developer, Georgia Virtual
Technical College; John Baker, president, Desire2Learn; and Bill Thomas,
director, SREB Educational Technology Cooperative.
What is contained in this resource?
A table of contents of SREB-SCORE Learning Object Metadata
follows below.
SREB-SCORE Learning Object Metadata
Table of Contents
| Overview of LOM v1.0 |
6 |
| Metadata Standards and Guidelines |
7 |
| Technical Standards |
11 |
| Definitions of Metadata and Learning Object |
12 |
| Digital Rights Management |
13 |
| LOM v1.0 Elements for the SREB-SCORE Initiative |
14 |
| Entering Metadata into LOM Fields |
15 |
| Table - LOM v1.0 |
16 |
| Appendix A |
|
| General Element 1.8 - Aggregation Level
(Granularity) |
33 |
| Appendix B |
|
| Educational Element 5.2 - Learning Resource Type |
36 |
| Appendix C |
|
| Classification Element 9.0: Explanations of
Purpose, Source, Id and Entry |
39 |
| Classification Element 9.0: Subject Element GEM
Controlled Vocabulary - Keywords |
44 |
| Classification Element 9.0: Other GEM Controlled
Vocabularies - ERIC Thesaurus - Other Authority Files - Keywords |
51 |
| Classification Element 9.0: Taxonomies Specific
to SREB Member State Education Agencies |
53 |
| XML Examples for SREB-SCORE Learning Object Metadata |
56 |
| MERLOT XML Schema-Instance (example) |
68 |
What resources are provided to expedite training for incorporating metadata
with a learning object?
Guidelines for implementing this resource are being developed that will
provide directives for incorporating metadata with learning objects that are
deposited in a state's repository.
Will all SREB states use this document as originally provided?
While this resource provides thorough guidelines and support for
implementing metadata, and care has been given to address a wide range of
possibilities of implementation, there will be unique reasons for
modifications of the metadata from time to time in any state.
Is the SREB-SCORE Learning Object Metadata resource posted on the SREB
Web site?
Yes, it is located on this site:
http://www.sreb.org/programs/EdTech/SCORE/index.asp, but it is only
available to SREB-SCORE participating members.
Selected metadata examples from the classification element (9.0) -
educational objective of the learning object using taxonomies of K-12 state
standards and higher education course numbers - are outlined on the following
page.
An example of a page selected from the SREB-SCORE Learning Object Metadata
document is in this document.
This entire document is available
as a PDF.
For more information, e-mail June Weis at
june.weis@sreb.org.
|