The 1996 High Schools That Work Assessment: Good News, Bad News and Hope
Brief 1 - 1997
By Gene Bottoms
he 1996 High Schools That Work
assessment report contains good news, bad news and hope. The
report shows that school, district and state efforts to implement
the High Schools That Work key practices to improve
student achievement are paying off for schools willing to sustain
their improvement efforts. The good news is apparent in four
ways:
- HSTW sites that
participated in the assessment in 1994 and again in 1996
showed significant improvement in average reading and
mathematics scores. The reading scores increased from 264
to 273 and the mathematics scores from 281 to 285.
- The percentage of
career-bound students meeting the HSTW performance
goals in 1994 and 1996 increased from 33 percent to 43
percent in reading and from 34 percent to 44 percent in
mathematics. The science performance declined
slightlyfrom 39 percent to 38 percent.
Students at the most
successful HSTW sitesthose who had ethnic,
racial and socioeconomic backgrounds similar to those of
students at all sitesexhibited remarkable success.
Almost 50 percent met the HSTW science goal, 66
percent met the reading goal and 63 percent met the
mathematics goal.
- HSTW sites
widened the gap between their career-bound students and
vocational students nationally between 1994 and 1996. In
1994, youth at HSTW sites had an average reading
score of 264, compared to 267 for vocational students in
the national sample. They had a mathematics score of 281,
compared to 277 for vocational students nationally, and a
science score of 282, compared to 267 for vocational
students in the national sample. By 1996, students at HSTW
sites had outpaced the national group in reading and had
increased the gap in mathematics and science. (See Figure
1.)
- A large proportion of
the 260 sites participating in the 1993 and 1994
assessments showed improvement in 1996: 60 percent
improved in reading, 49 percent improved in mathematics
and 53 percent improved in science.
The bad news is that the
mathematics achievement of African-American youth at HSTW
sites did not improve between 1994 and 1996. Also, more than half
of career-bound students at HSTW sites fell short of the HSTW
performance goals in reading, mathematics and science. These
youth are handicapped in getting and advancing in a good job and
pursuing further studies.
The hope lies in knowing what to
do to correct the situation. Embedded in the assessment
report given to each HSTW site, school leaders and
teachers can find what high-achieving schools are doing to get
more career-bound youth to meet the HSTW goals. Successful
schools:
Set high expectations and get
students to meet them.
HSTW sites that got
career-bound students to complete challenging assignments both in
and out of class had significantly higher reading, mathematics
and science scores. Student achievement was significantly higher
if students did at least one hour of homework daily outside of
class. Achievement also rose if students were encouraged to take
more mathematics and science courses, including one of each in
the 12th grade.
The bad news is that at least
one-third of career-bound youth are enrolled in watered-down
academic courses that they can pass without making any effort
outside of class. Thirty-nine percent of students who scored
below the basic level in mathematics and 36 percent who scored
below the basic level in science said they usually had no
homework or did not do it. Further, at least 61 percent of youth
had no weekly homework assignments from a vocational teacher.
Offer intellectually
challenging occupational studies.
The good news is that students who
used reading, writing, mathematics and science skills frequently
to complete challenging assignments in vocational classes had
significantly higher achievement.
The bad news is that half of
students who participated in the assessment at HSTW sites
in 1996 were enrolled in vocational courses that lacked
challenging assignments and projects. These students were not
required to apply mathematics to complete assignments, to seek
technical information and organize it into a procedure for
completing a project, to write critiques of their work or to make
oral reports. Such vocational programs are not preparing
todays youth for an information-centered economy. Rather,
they are denying youth access to higher paying jobs that require
learning and thinking skills.
Increase access to academic
studies that teach the essential content from the college
preparatory curriculum.
The good news is that HSTW sites
continue to make progress in the percentage of career-bound youth
taking higher-level English and mathematics courses. (See Figure
2.) Students who take rigorous academic courses have
significantly higher reading, mathematics and science
achievement. For example, students who completed the HSTW-recommended
curriculum in English, mathematics and science had average scores
that either approximated or exceeded the HSTW
goalsand had significantly higher achievement than students
who took lower-level courses. (See Figure 3.)
The bad news is that HSTW
sites still face a major hurdle in enrolling career-bound youth
in an English curriculum taught to college-preparatory standards.
Students in a college-prep curriculum develop the ability to
analyze situations, organize and synthesize written information
and make written reportsskills that are critical to success
in postsec-ondary education and a good job.
Also under the heading of bad
news, science departments at HSTW sites continue to deny
60 percent of career-bound youth access to a science curriculum
that builds problem-solving and science literacy skills. No
progress was made between 1994 and 1996 in enrolling more
career-bound students in courses such as chemistry, physics,
college-prep physical science and college-prep biology. It is
time to close down low-level science courses and enroll
career-bound youth in courses taught at the college prep level.
Yet, hope can be found in the 1996
data. If 64 percent of career-bound students at all HSTW
sites and 84 percent at high-achieving sites can complete a
demanding mathematics curriculum, these youth can also complete
demanding English and science curricula. (See Figure 2.) Career-bound
students do not need more English and science credits; they need
to take the "right courses" taught to high standards.
School leaders and teachers need
to acknowledge that career-bound youth can learn higher-level
academic content. The quicker a school decides to enroll
career-bound students in high-level courses, the quicker teachers
will learn how to teach high-level content to this group of
youth.
Have students complete a
challenging program of study consisting of an upgraded academic
core and a major. An upgraded core includes at least four years
of college preparatory English and three years each of
mathematics and science, including at least two years in each
area equivalent in content to courses offered in the college
preparatory curriculum. A major includes at least four Carnegie
units in a broad technical field or further academic studies and
two Carnegie units in related technical or academic core courses.
The good news is that students who
complete the HSTW-recommended curriculum greatly exceed
the HSTW goals in reading, mathematics and science. In
fact, students completing the recommended curriculum scored 16
points higher in reading, 27 points higher in mathematics and 14
points higher in science in the 1996 assessment than students who
completed a less demanding program of study. Students who
complete the HSTW-recommended curriculum at high-achieving
sites have average reading, mathematics and science scores that
begin to approximate those of college-prep students nationally.
The bad news is that 83 percent of
students at all HSTW sites and 63 percent at
high-achieving sites did not complete an upgraded academic core
and a career concentration. However, 64 percent of students at
all sites and 84 percent at high-achieving sites completed the
recommended curriculum in mathematics. This is evidence that the
problem is with the "system" rather than the student. Many
schools have weak guidance programs that fail to help
career-bound students and their parents understand what it takes
to succeed in further education and the workplace.
When an ineffective guidance system is coupled with a
curriculum system based on sorting and accommodating students,
the result is low performance by a group of youth who need more
rather than less rigor.
Provide a structured system of
work-based and school-based learning.
The good news is that students who
earn school credit in structured work-based learning programs
reported higher-quality learning experiences at the work site. A
significantly higher percentage of youth in organized work-based
learning programs reported that:
- Their job related to
their vocational studies.
- They rotated through
several departments.
- They observed veteran
workers.
- They learned new
technical skills.
- They were encouraged
to develop good work habits.
- They were shown how
to use mathematics in job-related activities.
- They were encouraged
to excel in academic studies.
- They were encouraged
to develop good customer relations.
- They learned how to
use reading, writing and speaking skills.
The good news also includes the
fact that students who work up to 15 to 20 hours a week have
higher reading, mathematics and science scores than students who
do not work at all or work more than 20 hours weekly.
The bad news is that students who
receive school credit for work-based learning have significantly
lower reading, mathematics and science achievements than students
who receive no credit. Two factors contribute to lower
achievement: 1) Students who receive credit are more likely to
work 21 hours or more per week and 2) They are much less likely
to take mathematics or science in the 12th grade.
The hope lies in the fact that
high school leadersincluding vocational leaderscan
set high standards for awarding school credit for work site
learning. In doing so, they should:
- Award work site
credit only to students who are completing the HSTW-recommended
curriculum.
- Require students to
take four school-based credits in the 12th grade,
including three credits in high-level academic
courses.
- Require students to
have a minimum 2.5 grade point average in core
academic courses to enter and remain in the
program.
- Enable academic and
vocational teachers to plan together.
The good news is that the 18 HSTW
sites participating in an advanced integrated learning
effortgiving academic and vocational teams time to do
collaborative planningmade more progress between 1994 and
1996 than all HSTW sites in increasing the percentage of
students meeting the reading and mathematics goals.
The bad news is that the
organizational structure and daily schedule at most high schools
deter teams of academic and vocational teachers from doing the
planning necessary to engage students in
intellectually-challenging assignments. Yet, when teachers work
together across the curriculum, they develop creative ways to get
students to work harder.
Engage each student actively in
the learning process.
The good news is that students
learn more when they are doing challenging assignments.
Activities associated with higher achievement include collecting,
evaluating, organizing and presenting information for senior
projects, major research papers, short reflective writing
assignments and special mathematics projects. Other activities
include solving open-ended problems and completing projects that
require academic and technical knowledge.
The bad news is that a lot of
career-bound youth at HSTW sites do not remember having to
complete intellectually-challenging assignments. For example,
more than 60 percent of these youth said they seldom or never:
- Made a presentation
in class about a special mathematics project.
- Used a computer to
complete a mathematics assignment.
- Made a presentation
in class about a science project.
- Prepared a written
report on a science project.
- Presented an oral
report in a vocational class.
Yet, these experiences are
associated with higher achievement. Schools that expect teachers
to prepare for many different course levels need to offer fewer
levels so that teachers will have time to develop
intellectually-challenging learning activities for all classes.
Involve each student and his or
her parents in planning a high school program of study.
The good news is that the
percentage of HSTW career-bound students planning to
pursue further study increased from 59 percent in 1994 to 66
percent in 1996.
The bad news is that at least half
of the students planning to continue their education were not
prepared to do so. The quality of guidance services provided to
career-bound youth did not improve very much between 1994 and
1996. More than one-third of career-bound youth at HSTW
sites in 1996 reported that they received no help in planning a
program of study or that they simply did not have such a program.
Only 20 percent of youth said they
met with their parents and a counselor or advisor to plan a
program of study. Advisors need to help career-bound youth and
their parents understand what is required for successful
transition into postsecondary studies or a primary job. This
failure to provide information and to confront youth with the
realities of life is one of the major weaknesses in improving the
quality of learning for career-bound youth.
Provide extra help.
The good news is that more than
half of career-bound students at HSTW sites reported
receiving extra help in reading from their English teachers,
while almost 80 percent reported receiving extra help from their
mathematics teachers. More than half reported that their families
helped in reading and mathematics. Fourteen percent received
extra help in reading from a special resource teacher, while five
percent benefited from a tutor. In mathematics, 15 percent got
help from a tutor and 12 percent from a special resource teacher.
The bad news is that 25 percent of
students who scored below the basic reading level received no
extra help in reading, while nine percent who scored below the
basic mathematics level received no extra help in mathematics.
Extra help services and an
extended school day, week and year must be more readily available
as schools enroll more career-bound youth in higher-level
language arts, mathematics and science courses.
Use student assessment to
advance student learning.
The good news is that HSTW
sites make improvement when they use data on student achievement
and on school and instructional practices to change what is
taught and what is expected. Schools make progress in advancing
student learning when leaders and teachers work together to find
and implement solutions to problems identified by the data.
The bad news is that too many
school leaders are failing to use data to engage the faculty in
continuous school improvement.
Summary
The most progressive schools in
the High Schools That Work network have shifted the
emphasis from finding fault to fixing the system. Parents and
business leaders as well as district, school and teacher-leaders
are working together to develop meaningful learning experiences
that send a message to youth that high performance counts.
Gene Bottoms is Vice President
for Education and Work at the Southern Regional Education Board.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Performance
of Students Completing Challenging Courses
|
| Curriculum Level |
Percent |
Average Score |
HSTW Goal |
| High-Level English Low-Level English
|
33 67
|
281
269
|
279
|
| High-Level
Mathematics Low-Level
Mathematics
|
64
36
|
294
270
|
295
|
| High-Level
Science Low-Level
Science
|
39
61
|
289
279
|
292
|
|
(97V09) Price: Free; 4 pages
This publication is an Adobe Acrobat PDF file. To
view, you will need to have the free Acrobat Reader
installed.
The latest reader is downloadable for free from
Adobe. |
 |
For information on other HSTW publications, please see the
HSTW Materials List.
For information on other SREB publications, please see the Publications
Catalog.
To order a hard copy of this or any other SREB publication, email
publications@sreb.org
or call (404) 875-9211, Ext. 236. Please be sure to reference the
publication name and number.
|