Work-Based Learning: Good News, Bad
News and Hope
Number 7 - 1997
by Gene Bottoms and Alice Presson
The 1996 High Schools That Work Assessment report contains
positive and negative findings, as well as reason for optimism, about the performance of
high school students who have after-school jobs. The assessment of reading, mathematics
and science performance was given to 12th-graders completing four courses in a vocational
concentration at the Southern Regional Education Boards High Schools That Work
sites. Seventy-one percent of the students who took the assessment had part-time jobs; 44
percent of assessed students were earning school credit for their work experiences.
The SREB learned from the assessment that students in structured
work-based learning programs1 cooperative vocational education,
apprenticeships and other programs in which students receive school credit have
richer learning experiences on the job than students who work but are not enrolled in such
programs. Also, students in structured work-based learning programs receive greater
support from schools than students who are not in such programs. Someone at school helps
students in these programs find and get the most out of a job and counsels them about
further learning opportunities.
In comparing the experiences of students in structured work-based
learning programs with those of students who just had a job, the SREB found
good news in two areas:
1. A larger percentage of students earning school credit reported
having higher-quality work-site learning experiences, including:
- Rotating through several jobs within a company;
- Working frequently with a work-site mentor; *
- Receiving instruction on how to do the work; *
- Learning new technical skills in the work setting; *
- Learning how to use good communication skills;
- Having their job performance evaluated by clear standards; *
- Being encouraged by employers daily or weekly to develop good work
habits. *
2. More students in structured programs used work experiences to
make the transition to a full-time job. Forty-one percent of students earning credit had
jobs where they planned to work after high school, compared with only 24 percent of
students who just had a job; 57 percent of students who earned credit had jobs
that related to their vocational concentrations, compared with only 25 percent of other
students who worked.
The bad news includes:
1. Students in work-based learning had lower achievement than
students who just had jobs. (See Figure 1.) There are two reasons: First, students who
earned credit spent more hours on the job than students who did not earn credit.
Forty-eight percent of students who earned credit spent more than 20 hours per week at
work, compared with only 29 percent of students who did not earn credit.
Second, fewer students who earned credit for their work took
mathematics and science courses during their senior year. Only 39 percent of students
earning credit took a mathematics course as a senior, compared with 51 percent of students
who did not receive credit. Only 27 percent of students earning credit took a science
course as a senior, compared with 38 percent of students who did not receive credit.
2. Males who earned credit had significantly lower reading,
mathematics and science achievement than males who just had a job. Fewer males
than females earned credit for work-site experiences 43 percent compared with 57
percent. There was no significant difference between the reading, mathematics and science
achievement of females who earned credit and females in unstructured work experiences.
3. A large percentage of students who earned credit were enrolled
in business and marketing programs 44 percent, compared with 33 percent of students
who did not receive credit. Yet business and marketing students who earned credit had
significantly lower achievement in reading and mathematics than students who just
had a job.
Figure 1
Achievement by Students Not Working, Students Just
in Jobs and Students in Work-Based Learning

|
The richer learning experiences of school-sponsored, work-based
learning do not offset the loss of learning that occurs when students leave school early
and fail to take high-level mathematics and science courses in their senior year. Data
from the 1996 HSTW Assessment offer little evidence that work-based learning
experiences are an acceptable substitute for chemistry, Algebra II and demanding language
arts courses.
Figure 2
Achievement of Students Who Earned Credit for Work
by the Frequency with Which their Vocational Teachers Gave Challenging Assignments
|
Vocational teachers stressed:
|
| Never |
264 |
276 |
| Often |
275 |
284 |
Note: |
Raising achievement of students in work-based
learning programs: Actions for school leaders and local employers
School leaders in collaboration with employers can
strengthen the performance of students in school-sponsored, work-based learning programs.
These actions include:
Setting high expectations and getting students to meet them
Students who earned school credit for work experiences had
significantly higher reading scores if they completed at least one hour of homework daily.
Mathematics and science scores were significantly higher if students were encouraged to
take more mathematics and science courses and if they took such courses as seniors.
The bad news is that nearly 40 percent of students who earned
school credit for their work experiences, compared with 33 percent of students who
just had a job, were enrolled in watered-down academic and vocational courses
that required no effort outside of class. Although reading achievement increased in
proportion to the amount of time spent reading each week, 25 percent of students who
earned school credit for their work experiences read only half an hour or less in a
typical week.
It may appear that many students avoid homework and read very
little because they work long hours: 48 percent work more than 20 hours per week. However,
lack of time may not be the reason. Seventy percent of students who earned school credit
spent two hours or more each day watching television. Are teachers allowing students to
use part-time employment as an excuse for inferior performance? Teachers and employers
need to send a consistent message that students are expected to do quality work and meet
high standards even if they have jobs.
Offering intellectually challenging vocational studies
Students who earned school credit for work had significantly
higher scores if their vocational teachers often gave challenging assignments that called
for knowledge and skills in communication, mathematics and science. (See Figure 2.) Among
students who earned school credit, those whose vocational teachers required them to read
technical manuals, apply mathematics and use a computer frequently to complete assignments
had significantly higher achievement in reading and mathematics than students whose
vocational teachers did not require these activities.
The bad news is that half of the students who received school
credit were enrolled in vocational courses that lacked challenging assignments and
projects. Vocational teachers need to raise standards in preparing youths for success in
an information-centered workplace. One approach is to use industry standards to develop
vocational curricula and to design challenging, school-based projects that support the
teaching of complex academic and technical content.
Schools don't expect enough from students
who receive credit for jobs
Too few students who receive credit for after-school jobs are being
challenged in their classes. The 1996 High Schools That Work Assessment revealed that:
Fifty-four percent rarely were required to use communication skills
such as researching technical information and organizing it into work-site plans
to complete vocational assignments;
Forty-four percent rarely were required to apply mathematics to complete
vocational assignments;
Sixty-eight percent rarely had to apply science to complete vocational
assignments;
Thirty-four percent seldom or never had to use a computer to complete a
vocational assignment;
Fifty-eight percent rarely had to make a presentation in class.
|
Increasing access to academic studies that teach high-level
content
Students in work-based learning programs who completed high-level
English, mathematics and science courses had significantly higher average scores in
reading, mathematics and science than students in similar programs who took lower-level
courses. (See Figure 3.) However, none of these students met the HSTW goals. By
comparison, students who took high-level courses and just had jobs met or
exceeded the HSTW goals.
High schools must expect students who work outside of school
whether or not in a structured learning environment to complete academic
courses that develop skills in:
- Analyzing situations;
- Organizing and synthesizing written information;
- Communicating clearly;
- Measuring accurately;
- Understanding and using concepts in geometry, statistics, algebra,
biology, chemistry and physical science;
- Conducting inquiries and solving real problems using mathematics
and science.
Requiring students to complete a challenging program of
study
High Schools That Work recommends a program of study
consisting of:
- An upgraded academic core that includes four units of college
preparatory English and at least three units each of mathematics and science, including at
least two units in each area equivalent in content to courses offered in the college
preparatory curriculum.
- A major that includes at least four units in a broad technical
field or in further academic studies.
Students who earned school credit for work and completed two of
the three academic parts of the HSTW-recommended curriculum (see above) either met
or exceeded the HSTW goals of 279 in reading, 295 in mathematics and 292 in
science. On a scale of 0 to 500, these youths scored 15 points higher in reading, 25
points higher in mathematics and 13 points higher in science than students who completed a
less-demanding program of study.
The bad news is that 84 percent of students who earned credit for
work experiences failed to complete all components of an upgraded academic core and a
vocational concentration.
Figure 3
Performance of Work-Based Learning Students by Courses Taken
|
Students in Work-Based Learning Programs |
Students Who "Just Had a Job" |
|
|
|
Percent Enrolled |
Average Score |
Percent Enrolled |
Average Score |
| High-Level English |
33 |
278 |
33 |
283 |
| Low-Level English |
67 |
267 |
67 |
270 |
| High-Level Mathematics |
61 |
291 |
67 |
296 |
| Low-Level Mathematics |
39 |
268 |
33 |
271 |
| High-Level Science |
37 |
285 |
40 |
291 |
| Low-Level Science |
63 |
277 |
60 |
280 |
|
Many students earning credit for work experiences use their jobs
as an excuse to leave school early. This happens when teachers, counselors, employers and
parents ignore students need to acquire knowledge and skills for postsecondary
studies and the workplace. School leaders can address this problem by requiring students
in school-sponsored, work-based learning programs to:
- Complete the HSTW-recommended academic core and an academic
or a career major in a chosen field of study;
- Take at least three advanced academic core courses in the 12th
grade, including a high-level mathematics or science course;
- Limit employment to 20 hours per week.
Integrating school-based and work-based learning
Students who earn credit for work are more likely to connect
school experiences with work experiences. (See Figure 4.) Vocational teachers rather than
academic teachers are more apt to help students make such connections.
Academic teachers cannot use work-based experiences to advance
academic goals if they do not have an opportunity to learn about such experiences. To
address this problem, schools often place academic teachers on advisory committees
responsible for planning work-based learning programs. They also arrange for teachers to
serve summer or school-year internships in local business and industry.
Figure 4
Experiences that Connect School-Based Learning and
Work-Based Learning
|
Percentage of Students Having Connecting Experiences |
|
Students Receiving Credit for Work |
Students Not Receiving Credit for Work |
Found at School:
| Work is related to student's vocational courses. |
57% |
25% |
| Teachers know that student works and what he/she does at
work. |
51% |
38% |
Found at Work
| Work detracts from student's time to do schoolwork. |
13% |
30% |
| Employer encourages student to develop good work habits. |
92% |
76% |
| Employer encourages student in academic studies. |
76% |
54% |
| Employer shows student how to use mathematics in job-related
activities. |
72% |
52% |
| Employer shows student how to use reading, writing, and
speaking skills on the job. |
82% |
63% |
| Someone taught student how to do the work. |
91% |
71% |
| Employer helped student learn new technical skills. |
84% |
57% |
| Employer encouraged student to develop good customer
relations. |
89% |
73% |
|
Another approach is for academic teachers to work with vocational
teachers and employers to develop learning activities that advance students academic
skills. Academic teachers can:
- Ask students to provide detailed answers to challenging questions
about communication, mathematics and science concepts used on the job;
- Require students to develop portfolios that contain examples of
academic knowledge and skills used at the work site;
- Require students to demonstrate their work-site learning;
- Teach problem-solving competencies needed in the workplace and
further study;
- Require students to do field-based investigations and community
projects linked to work-site experiences;
- Arrange for students to have adult work-site mentors and coaches.
Engaging students actively in the learning process
Students who earn school credit for their work experiences learn
more when they are engaged in doing challenging school-based assignments. Students have
higher achievement when they:
- Collect, evaluate, organize and present information for senior
projects;
- Complete major research papers;
- Do short, reflective writing assignments;
- Complete special mathematics projects.
Half of the students who earned credit for their work experiences
said their teachers did not relate content to the real world. In interviews at HSTW
sites, most students who earned credit said it is difficult to learn challenging content
if it is not connected to things they already know or recognize as valuable beyond the
school.
Many students did not remember having to complete intellectually
challenging assignments. For example:
- Sixty-eight percent never made a presentation in class about a
special mathematics project;
- Fifty-one percent never used a computer to complete a mathematics
assignment;
- Fifty-eight percent seldom presented oral reports in vocational
classes;
- Thirty-nine percent never completed an assignment using
mathematics as it is used in a work setting.
Teachers can motivate students to connect challenging academic
content to its application in the workplace. For example:
- English teachers can require major written reports describing all
aspects of an industry in which students are employed. To complete such a report, a
student would interview a variety of employees, read documents about the company, write
and refine draft copies, and prepare a final report that meets workplace and English
standards.
- Mathematics and social studies teachers can require students to
find workplace applications of major concepts studied in class and prepare a portfolio
containing a written summary and examples of applications.
- Mathematics, science and vocational teachers can work together to
develop projects that cause students to use science and mathematics in researching a
problem in the community or the workplace and developing a solution to the problem.
Students would develop an essential question that the project would address,
work with the teacher and a work- site mentor to develop an investigative design, carry
out the investigation and present findings in written and oral presentations.
- Vocational teachers can ask students to keep a portfolio of major
projects and tasks completed at the work site and give a demonstration of a product or
service based on work-site experiences. They also can work with employers to develop
real-world standards for evaluating students portfolios, products, services and
demonstrations.
Involving students and their parents in planning a high
school program of study
Sixty percent of students who earned school credit for work
experiences planned to pursue further study, but only 33 percent completed an adequate
academic core and only 40 percent really were equipped to continue their studies.
Many students do not receive guidance services to help them
understand the requirements of postsecondary study. Thirty-two percent of students who
earned credit for work experiences received no help in planning a high school program of
study or simply did not have a plan. Only 23 percent met with their parents and a
counselor or a teacher-adviser to plan a program of study. And only 36 percent of students
who earned credit for their work experiences said their employers frequently encouraged
them to excel in academics.
School leaders can work with postsecondary representatives to
give students, parents and teachers a reality check on the strengths and
weaknesses of students preparation for postsecondary learning. A reality
check can include a postsecondary placement exam or the testimony of former students
who had to take remedial courses.
Providing extra help
Nearly 60 percent of students who earned credit for work
experiences reported receiving extra help in reading from their English teachers. Almost
80 percent reported receiving extra help from their mathematics teachers. The bad news is
that fewer than 23 percent of students who received credit for work and scored below the
basic level in reading and mathematics got extra help in these areas.
Schools need to provide tutorial services and extra help to
students who lack mathematics and reading skills. All students who earn credit for
work-based learning must take a mathematics or science course in their senior year and a
demanding language-arts course that requires extensive reading and writing.
Opportunities arise every day to help students reach new levels
of knowledge and skills in school and in their part-time jobs. Some additional ways to
increase student achievement include:
- Having students serve as consultants to local
employers. Groups of students can design marketing campaigns, conduct demographic studies
or design printed materials for local companies.
- Asking students to share their work-based learning experiences
with other students in the high school, middle school or elementary school. This approach
hones students organizational and presentation skills and makes them aware of gaps
in their knowledge.
- Assigning students as part of their jobs to complete challenging
long-term projects that relate to the work site and require development of new knowledge
and skills. Employers can ask teachers to help design projects that students will be
expected to complete in the workplace. Projects should support school-based learning, and
teachers can ensure that high-quality academic skills are an integral part of them.
- Arranging for working students to participate in seminars
conducted by their academic and vocational teachers at the work site. This approach
provides opportunities for educators and employers to address the need for tougher
classroom and workplace learning experiences.
- Encouraging students to do independent research on topics related
to their jobs. Research can open students eyes to career possibilities and the need
for further education.
- Introducing students to new technology that they will be expected
to know in many work environments. Employers can help the school update equipment and
teaching skills.
(97V15) Price: $1; 8 pages
This publication is an Adobe Acrobat PDF file. To
view, you will need to have the free Acrobat Reader
installed.
The latest reader is downloadable for free from
Adobe. |
 |
For information on other HSTW publications, please see the
HSTW Materials List.
For information on other SREB publications, please see the Publications
Catalog.
To order a hard copy of this or any other SREB publication, email
publications@sreb.org
or call (404) 875-9211, Ext. 236. Please be sure to reference the
publication name and number.
|