Case Study
LEE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL AND
LEE COUNTY AREA TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Beattyville, Ky.
A technology center and a high school
defy poverty, diminished dreams and a weak economy
by blending rigorous academics with native hands-on ability.
This case study is about the combined efforts of a technology
center and a high school to improve achievement by changing the way students learn and the
way teachers teach. It is also about grit, determination, enthusiasm and an
unyielding faith in young people.
THE SETTING
Lee County High School (LCHS) and Lee County Area Technology
Center (LCATC) are located in Beattyville, Ky., in the southeastern part of the state at
the edge of Natural Bridge State Park. Geographically, this area is where the bluegrass
meets the mountains. The population of Lee County is approximately 8,400, including 1,400
students enrolled in grades K-12. One percent of the students are minorities.
The Beattyville economic base has changed dramatically during
this century. From the early 1900s to the mid 1970s, the oil and gas industry was robust.
In the mid-1970s, the wells closed, with nothing to replace them. The current economy
consists of a data-entry company, a uniform-manufacturing company, a prison and a few
local merchants with predominantly minimum-wage employees. Many residents drive an hour or
more to jobs in Richmond, Winchester, Mt. Sterling and Lexington. Seventy-four percent of
local students qualify for free or reduced-price lunches.
The high school and the technology center share a common campus
and a common vision about how to educate their young people. Some 90 percent of Lee County
High School students attend classes at the technology center. A division of the Kentucky
Technical Center network, the center serves three counties Lee, Owsley and Wolfe
all designated by the Appalachian Regional Commission as economically distressed.
Two of the counties Lee and Owsley are part of High Schools That Work
(HSTW).
THE NEED FOR CHANGE
The depressed economy and lack of promising careers for Lee
County youths led to what Principal Frank Kincaid of the technology center described
as "floating students" who had no plan for their education and no purpose for
being in school. These students were "getting by" taking a minimum load
of mostly low-level courses. In 1988, Kincaid heard about the Southern Regional Education
Boards High Schools That Work initiative to raise the
achievement of high school students. Seeing the HSTW whole-school revitalization
approach as the key to improving his school, he applied to have Lee County ATC become one
of Kentuckys pilot HSTW sites. When the school was not selected, Kincaid
began implementing the HSTW key practices anyway. Glen Wilson, Lee County school
superintendent, supported Kincaids efforts. The county funded both the ATC and the
high school and gave them the "green light" to move forward in implementing the HSTW
key practices.
From the beginning, teachers from the high school and the
technology center were combined for staff development and common planning. The two schools
identified the following strategies to raise achievement and to change what and how
students are taught:
- Eliminating low-level courses;
- Increasing graduation requirements;
- Improving communication and cooperation between schools;
- Training staff in applied instructional strategies;
- Raising students aspirations;
- Involving the community in a partnership to support higher
standards for student learning and to provide work-based learning experiences.
The schools began by eliminating the general track, using applied
instructional strategies and implementing a modified block schedule. During the ensuing
years, the staff worked with a limited budget to institute project-based instruction,
including projects that integrated mathematics, English, science and technical skills.
Students were required to read more, write more, do oral presentations and keep journals.
BUILDING CONSENSUS: Getting Teachers to Work Together and
Supporting Their Efforts
Wilson, Kincaid and Principal Sam Watkins of Lee County High
School knew the first step in raising standards was to break down barriers between
vocational programs and academic programs. They scheduled joint faculty meetings for the
technology center and the high school and created a daily time when teachers could meet
and plan together.
Consensus did not occur immediately. Some feelings were hurt as
changes were initiated, but they were healed as teachers began to communicate across
department lines. Site-based councils created as a result of the Kentucky education
reform legislation were a factor in building consensus. Faculty from both schools
were appointed to council subcommittees and were involved in planning and decision making.
Center staff were made a part of all advisory and instructional committees. In the first
year, 90 percent of the two staffs attended the HSTW summer staff development
conference.
Common planning was encouraged by eliminating home-room periods
and giving teachers 25 minutes daily to collaborate. Kincaid and Watkins worked with
Lexington hotels and restaurants to create a weekend getaway package for teachers who
provided written documentation of their joint instructional activities during the first
six weeks. Watkins says, "We only had to do that once. The teachers all saw how much
difference the joint assignments made with students."
Kincaid sees curriculum alignment required by the Kentucky
education reform initiative as another factor in helping teachers realize that they have a
responsibility to see that the 56 state-mandated curriculum competencies are taught to all
students. Working together to embed the competencies throughout the curriculum made
teachers aware of how they could collaborate to help students achieve at a higher level.
The two schools conducted a needs assessment using state data; a
survey of parents, students and staff; a professional development survey; and
community/school craft committee meetings. Teachers and the community agreed that the
ultimate objective was to prepare students to be successful, productive members of a
global society. This involved raising expectations and requiring all students to complete
a rigorous academic and technical curriculum.
The high school and the technology center often share staff
development funds so that teachers from both schools can benefit from staff development
experiences. Many teachers from both schools attend the annual HSTW staff
development conference. Teachers have also participated in staff development to learn how
to use applied instructional methods in academic courses, introduce reading for learning
across the curriculum, integrate academic and vocational studies (through the SREBs
telecourse series) and use real-life examples in teaching mathematics. Early staff
development from SREB on eliminating the general track and implementing block scheduling
helped the schools "sell" these concepts to the faculty, Kincaid said. Lee
County teachers have participated in staff development sessions on school improvement,
project-based learning and the Ford Academy of Manufacturing Sciences. Because teachers
have time to meet and plan daily, they are able to share ideas and experiences from their
staff development activities.
ELIMINATING LOW-LEVEL COURSES AND INCREASING GRADUATION
REQUIREMENTS
Eliminating the general track happened gradually. First, the
schools added new courses such as Principles of Technology (applied physics). Next came
the elimination of low-level mathematics courses. English courses were revised by raising
standards and including applied communication concepts in the content. Advanced Placement
English was added as a senior option. The science curriculum was redesigned to include
applied instructional methods in all courses, and all students now take the same science
courses. (See Table 1.)
Table 1
Changes in Graduation Requirements and Course
Offerings
Since Becoming a High Schools That Work
Site
Lee County, Ky.
| Content Area |
Before
1994-95 General Track College Prep |
CURRENT |
| Language Arts |
General
English I-IV Credits required: 4 |
College
Prep English I-IV Credits required: 4 |
College
Prep English I-IV or AP English as a senior elective
Credits required: 4 |
| Mathematics |
Fundamental
Math Essential Math
Consumer Math
Credits required: 3 |
Algebra I
and II, Geometry, Pre-Calculus and Calculus Credits
required: 3 |
Integrated
Math I, II, III or Algebra I, II and Geometry
Pre-calculus
Calculus
College Algebra
Credits required: 3 |
| Science |
Integrated
Science Applied Science
Credits required: 2 |
Biology,
Chemistry and Physics Credits required: 3 |
Introduction
to Chemistry/Physics Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Credits required: 3 |
| Social Studies |
U.S.
History Political Science
World Civilization
Credits required: 2 |
U.S.
History, Political Science and World Civilization Credits
required: 3 |
U.S.
History Political Science
World Civilization
AP U.S. History
Credits required: 3 |
| Technology |
NONE |
NONE |
1 credit in
computer technology required for all students. |
| Academic or Career Concentration |
NONE |
NONE |
Academic concentration:
1 additional credit in both mathematics and science required; 2 credits in a foreign
language recommended Career concentration: 4 credits in a
technology area required; 1 additional credit in both mathematics and science strongly
recommended. |
| Electives |
9 |
7 |
Academic concentration:
11
Career concentration: 9 |
| Total Credits Required |
20 |
20 |
27 |
Eliminating low-level and multi-level courses and raising
graduation requirements looked easy on paper, but students reacted strongly when told they
had to take another mathematics course and an extra science course in senior year. The
community did not immediately accept the decision of the two schools to break the
tradition of giving most of the attention to the top 20 to 25 percent of students and
allowing the rest of the students to "get by." The changes in courses reflected
tougher mathematics, science and communications skills requirements for all students.
Technical courses were revised to incorporate workplace standards and requirements for
reading and mathematics portfolio entries. Units required to graduate increased from 20 to
27.
Not all teachers were initially enthusiastic. However, a GOALS
2000 staff development activity in business and industry throughout the state opened
teachers eyes to the kinds of skills employers want entry-level employees to
possess. The experience showed teachers that they had to change the way they were
teaching. The Kentucky Education Reform Act of 1990 also prompted the schools to make
curriculum changes. "Eventually, school leaders, faculty, students, parents and local
employers realized that future success is tied to solid academic preparation in high
school," Kincaid said.
Tougher standards have brought increases in students entering
postsecondary education and training and the number (93 percent last year) of graduates
making a successful transition to education, work or the military. The dropout rate has
declined slightly since the introduction of more rigorous requirements. (See data
later in this report.)
MODIFYING THE SCHEDULE
Lee County administrators and teachers agree that block
scheduling was a direct outgrowth of eliminating lower-level courses and making all
courses more challenging. "We had to have longer periods of time to let students
visit the workplace and complete authentic, hands-on projects," one teacher said.
Academic teachers including many who swore by the traditional schedule of six
periods taught over the course of a year were more reluctant than vocational
teachers to convert to block scheduling. After voting to modify the instructional
schedule, the teachers changed their minds and held extra faculty meetings to debate the
issues. They also called on Lynn Canady, national expert on block scheduling, to conduct a
workshop in Lee County. Eventually, the teachers agreed that block scheduling was
necessary 1) to enable students to take more courses and earn more credits and 2) to
enable teachers to develop joint projects and create workplace applications to increase
student learning.
Based on local needs, Lee County has modified the original 4 x 4
block schedule. Both principals feel that local finances, teacher credentials and skills,
conflicting interests and other local issues must be taken into consideration when moving
to a block schedule. For example, Lee County found that it could offer some courses only
once a year, e.g., foreign language courses and certain mathematics courses. The Lee
County schedule includes five blocks. The first, second and fourth blocks are 90 minutes
long; the third and fifth blocks are 45 minutes each. The courses taught in the 45-minute
blocks are typically full-year courses. This schedule allows Lee County students to earn a
maximum of 32 credits.
RAISING EXPECTATIONS
Today, Lee County students and parents understand and support the
requirements for high school graduation. Initially, however, many students and parents
resisted the tougher standards and more rigorous curriculum. Students were accustomed to
handling their courses with a minimum of effort. Under the new plan, parents of more able
students were concerned that their children might not receive the attention they had been
given previously; parents of other students feared their children would not be able to
keep up. A new schedule, new instructional strategies and an improved guidance system
converted parents and students to higher standards.
Prior to entering high school, students meet with parents,
teachers and a counselor to develop an Individual Graduation Plan (IGP) that identifies a
planned sequence of courses leading to postsecondary education, employment or both.
Courses for each sequence are specified, and academic core courses are the same for all
students. The only variations are related to the students post-high school goals.
For example, students pursuing an academic concentration are required to earn four
mathematics credits and four science credits and are encouraged to take AP English in the
senior year. Students pursuing a technical concentration are required to take three (and
are recommended to take four) courses each in mathematics and science. Parents sign the
IGP and approve any changes. Students are not allowed to graduate early.
Every student has a teacher-adviser who guides him/her and
monitors progress in meeting graduation requirements. Lee Countys advisory program
includes planned experiences for each year of high school to help students explore career
and educational options and to help them develop study skills, decision-making skills,
interpersonal skills and employment skills. An extra-help system boosts students who may
be having problems with a particular course. Tutoring is available before and after
school, and students can repeat a course in the summer if necessary.
The more rigorous course requirements at the two schools have led
to changes in homework and study patterns for all students. Nearly three-fourths of Lee
Countys vocational students reported having an hour or more of homework in their
vocational classes weekly, compared to only 36 percent of students at other HSTW
sites reporting this level of homework. Frank Kincaid says the tradition of little or no
homework in vocational classes has been difficult to change, but most Lee County ATC
teachers have finally seen the value of making assignments such as having students prepare
for in-class projects by reading technical manuals ahead of time. Vocational teachers also
require their students to contribute at least one assignment a month to the writing
portfolios that are maintained as part of graduation requirements. Overall, 54 percent of
Lee County vocational students reported completing an hour or more of homework daily,
compared to 42 percent at other HSTW sites.
Lee County students demonstrate their accomplishments by
completing an Integrated Academic Portfolio (IAP) as part of graduation requirements.
Principals and faculty see the portfolio as a way to give prospective employers and
postsecondary institutions a "picture" of a graduate and his/her talents and
skills. One goal is to persuade employers to use the portfolio as part of the hiring
process. This will help students understand the value of completing the portfolio and will
give them a head start in getting a job or applying to postsecondary schools and colleges.
Adviser-advisee groups focus on making sure the portfolio is completed during the senior
year.
The portfolio is designed to give a broad perspective on the
students high school accomplishments and employment skills. It includes:
- A résumé;
- A model employment application letter;
- School attendance records;
- Transcripts of high school grades and test scores;
- Exemplary assignments from across the curriculum;
- Letters of recommendation from two teachers and one or more other
adults (not family members) who have worked with the student in some way;
- A school-community activity report that shows involvement in
organizations and activities in school and in the community;
- Awards and recognition for academic, extracurricular and
community-based activities;
- A letter written by the student to his or her adviser, reflecting
the value of high school and technology center experiences;
- A letter from the adviser responding to the student.
PROJECT-BASED INSTRUCTION
Superintendent Wilson was first in the district to make the
connection between project-based learning and the way students live outside of school. The
local heritage of farming and working in the oil and gas industry is primarily
"hands-on." Wilson recognized that many young people cannot get real-world
skills by staring at words on a page.
Teachers at the two schools also came to realize that
project-based, integrated academic and vocational instruction was a promising vehicle to
motivate students, foster teamwork, increase accountability, improve attendance and raise
achievement. In visits to business and industry throughout the state, academic and
vocational teachers asked employers about the skills needed by entry-level workers. The
answers were the same everywhere: good communication skills, mathematics skills, the
ability to apply scientific concepts, the ability to solve problems, a good work ethic,
and the ability to get along with others. Lee County teachers saw immediately that they
needed to do a better job of introducing authentic problems into the classroom. They asked
for and received staff development on project-based learning, integrated academic and
vocational studies, and applied academic instruction.
Lee County teachers often make joint assignments and arrange for
students to visit vocational and academic classes. For example, one algebra teacher takes
his students to an auto technology class to give them a better understanding of ratio and
proportion. The algebra students and the auto technology students discuss algebra concepts
used in the class. Physics teachers also take their students to the auto technology lab.
As a result of projects and integrated assignments, teachers from the high school and the
technology center have formed stronger bonds in preparing their students.
Teachers at the two schools are convinced that students learn at
a higher level and retain more of what they study by completing projects and using
real-world applications. "All students benefit, because their different learning
styles are taken into account in project-based learning," Sam Watkins said.
"At-risk students as well as top students gain when they are engaged in solving real
problems."
Three integrated academic and vocational projects completed by
Lee County students are described below. As Frank Kincaid said, "Projects cause
vocational and technical students to think in academic terms and give all students chances
to solve problems."
THE DRAG RACER PROJECT
More than 150 Lee County students gutted and rebuilt a 1991Chevy
Beretta. Two years after starting the project, they watched the vehicle race competitively
across the Mountain Parkway Motorplex. The car is now on display at the area technology
center.
Mathematics, physics, welding, business, industrial technology
and art students were involved in modifying the car to meet National Hot Rod Association
specifications. "Instead of simply reading about math and physics principles, these
students applied them in conjunction with welding, industrial technology and auto
technology as they made changes to the car," said Richard Kazsuk, the auto technology
teacher who spearheaded the project.
Using guidelines from their business classes, students formed a
corporation, created budgets for various phases of the work, and issued paychecks. They
also used graphics arts techniques to design and print a logo for the car.
Students had to meet high standards for their various academic
and vocational classes. For example, they had to be able to write work orders and use
precision measuring devices such as calipers, micrometers, stopwatches and digital timers
in mathematics and automotive technology classes; work from shop prints and drawings in
welding classes; and compute salaries and deductions in business classes.
THE "REALITY CHECK" PROJECT
A "dose of reality" convinced Lee County students to
take a hard look at whether they had the right career in mind. This "reality
check" project was a one-day event conceived by Mike Patrick, High Schools That
Work coordinator for Lee County High School and Lee County Area Technology Center.
Patrick thought of the idea after listening to students talk in unrealistic terms about
their plans for the future.
One day was set aside for students to participate in the project,
which allowed them to choose a career, evaluate what they selected, and decide if they
were headed in the right
direction. Each students "career" had to match
his/her high school program of study and grade point average. A "salary" was
assigned based on the career choice.
The first stop of the day was a visit to "Uncle Sam,"
who deducted taxes and social security payments from the students
"salary." Next, the students visited "mandatory" booths where
real-life "expenses" were subtracted from their bank accounts. These expenses
included the cost of housing, transportation, food, clothing, utilities, child care,
insurance, furniture, phone service, medical and dental services and property taxes. They
also visited "optional" booths where they could spend "money" on
extras such as entertainment, cell phones, pagers, computers, televisions and VCRs.
Students were required to draw a "chance card" at
another booth. These cards represented "unexpected" expenses such as car repairs
and medical and dental expenses not covered by insurance. The "unexpected" could
also be positive, such as inheriting money from a relative. By the end of the day, many
students were happy to visit the "SOS" booth where a financial counselor helped
them re-evaluate their choices.
"Many students were shocked at what it costs just to
survive," Patrick said. "Others realized very quickly that if they dont
make the right choices and prepare for the future, they wont be able to make a good
life for themselves."
THE VIKING SHIP PROJECT
The welding instructor at Lee County Area Technology Center
designed a project to engage students in building a Viking ship made of steel instead of
wood. This integrated academic and vocational project involved 80 students from a number
of classes at Lee County High School. The ship is on display at the technology center.
Working with a set of design prints from Norway and using modern
technology to determine proper specifications, welding students worked with office
technology students to produce a design for the ship Gokstadskibit. Students
applied principles of physics and mathematics to calculate the appropriate size and the
wood-to-steel conversions.
Students learned to convert metric to English measurement,
convert decimals to fractions, understand scale, make construction drawings, estimate
materials from a construction print, build a cardboard model, and construct metal parts
from the model. If a conversion was inaccurate and the design did not work, students had
to go back to the drawing board. In some instances, students had to scrap three or four
days of work and begin again.
Students from other classes planned and conducted a traditional
keel-laying ceremony. All rituals were observed, including a solo sung by a Norwegian
citizen via long-distance speaker phone.
Many integrated projects are conducted on a smaller scale. For
example, students in health sciences, family and consumer sciences and academic classes
teamed up to study medical and health conditions that affect young people. Biology and
health sciences students completed a unit on DNA. Physics and auto technology students
studied the operation of high-compression engines. "Lee County High School teachers
view the area technology center as a million-dollar applied learning lab," Sam
Watkins said.
INVOLVING THE COMMUNITY
Both principals sing the praises of parents and local employers
who serve on the site-based school improvement council and advisory committee members who
work with the vocational programs. Local businesses have created some work-based learning
opportunities for students, but the school has had to look to larger communities 20 or
more miles away for additional placements. Sometimes an instructor and an employer will
work together to create a placement that is related to a students career area when
one that is directly related is unavailable. Last year, 45 of 68 Lee County 12th-graders
were placed in work-based learning in 26 different businesses.
Most of the placements are cooperative education. However, health
sciences students intern at health facilities and other students serve internships at a
local law office and the local newspaper. All placements are monitored by school personnel
to make sure students are adequately supervised and are learning new skills. Students turn
in weekly reports from their work-site mentors, who rate the students on performance,
punctuality and work habits. Students also keep journals that contain entries on the
assignments they are completing and the academic skills being used to perform tasks.
HIGHER EXPECTATIONS PRODUCE RESULTS
The High Schools That Work Assessment is a major barometer
for HSTW sites in gauging how well they are implementing the key practices that
impact student achievement. The 1996 assessment showed that Lee County High School and Lee
County Area Technology Center have made considerable progress in having students complete
a more rigorous program of study and tackle more challenging assignments in their classes.
Lee Countys scores on many indicators, including academic achievement, were
significantly higher than those of other sites that have been in the HSTW network a
similar period of time. (These other sites are referred to as "Experienced HSTW
Sites" in the following tables.)
Table 2
Comparison of Students Average Achievement
Scores on the HSTW Assessment
in Lee County and at Experienced HSTW Sites
|
Lee County |
Experienced HSTW
Sites |
| Reading (Goal 275) Mathematics (Goal 295)
Science (Goal 292) |
282 289
292 |
273 285
283 |
Table 3
Comparison of Lee County and Experienced HSTW
Sites
in Percentage of Students Completing the HSTW-Recommended
Curriculum and Their Average Achievement Scores
| |
English
Curriculum Percentage Reading Score |
Mathematics
Curriculum Percentage Mathematics Score |
Science
Curriculum Percentage Science Score |
| Lee County Completed curriculum
Did not complete |
49%
289
51% 276 |
74%
296
26% 270 |
77%
293
23% 287 |
| Experienced HSTW
Sites Completed curriculum
Did not complete |
34%
281
66% 269 |
66%
294
34% 269 |
42%
289
58% 279 |
Table 4
Comparison of Lee County and Experienced HSTW
Sites
in Percentage of Students Taking Advanced Courses
| Courses Taken |
Percentage
of Students Lee County |
Percentage
of Students Experienced HSTW Sites |
| Academic English or AP English |
55% |
28% |
| Algebra I Algebra II
Pre-Calculus/Calculus
Taking Math in Grade 12 |
69% 73%
26%
54% |
57% 53%
8%
47% |
| Chemistry (Lab) Physics (Lab)
Taking Science in Grade 12 |
71% 64%
49% |
44% 26%
34% |
In 1996, Lee County students outperformed those from other HSTW
sites on the HSTW achievement tests in reading, mathematics and science. Lee
Countys higher achievement is due in part to having more students who:
- Completed a rigorous academic core;
- Took academic English classes throughout high school;
- Took advanced mathematics classes (Algebra II and higher);
- Took college prep-level laboratory science classes;
- Took mathematics and science courses in grade 12.
Lee County Requires More Effort of Students
The 1996 HSTW Student Survey showed that Lee County had
progressed faster than other HSTW sites in changing how students are taught, even
though the school had increased the number of students taking an upgraded academic core.
Table 5
Comparison of Lee County and Experienced HSTW
Sites
in Percentages of Students Reporting Challenging Classroom Assignments
| Students said they
were required to: |
Lee County |
Experienced HSTW
Sites |
| Make an oral
presentation several times a year; Do a major research
paper several times a year;
Complete short writing assignments often;
Use a computer to do vocational assignments;
Do science lab assignments solving workplace or community
problems. |
79% 67%
91%
58%
74% |
45% 26%
73%
45%
46% |
Lee County vocational teachers are also challenging their
students. Student surveys show that Lee County vocational teachers are doing a better job
than vocational teachers at other HSTW sites in stressing academic skills. Teachers
are devising learning experiences and lab assignments that add value to academic
achievement and are requiring students to use academic skills to complete real-world
assignments.
Table 6
Comparison of Lee County and Experienced HSTW
Sites
in Percentages of Students Whose Vocational Teachers Stress Academic Skills
| Students said
their vocational teachers: |
Lee County |
Experienced HSTW
Sites |
| Often stressed reading; Often stressed writing;
Often stressed mathematics;
Often stressed science;
Required them to use scientific concepts to explain particular
systems;
Required them to use mathematics to solve vocational or
work-related problems. |
61% 86%
70%
70%
42%
63% |
45% 46%
58%
34%
25%
56% |
Lee Countys commitment to instructional improvement is
apparent in the kinds of instructional experiences students report. The countys
higher student achievement scores are the result of having teachers across the curriculum
give more assignments requiring students to:
- Do work outside of class;
- Collect, evaluate, organize and present information (orally and in
writing);
- Apply academic knowledge and skills to solve authentic real-world
problems.
Lee County Shows Steady Progress on Statewide Assessments
The Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) is
the achievement accountability component of the educational reform legislation passed by
the state in 1990-91. The state established a baseline achievement index for each school
when the accountability system went into effect, and sets an improvement goal for each
school annually.
Table 7
Lee County Academic Trend Data, 1994-97
KIRIS Performance Report
| Subject |
1994-95 |
1996-97 |
| Reading |
39 |
71 |
| Mathematics |
46 |
50 |
| Science |
48 |
54 |
| Social Studies |
49 |
59 |
| Arts & Humanities |
24 |
21 |
| Practical Living/ Vocational
Studies |
33 |
30 |
| Writing |
24 |
40 |
| Accountability Index |
48 |
57 |
NOTE: Index scale = 0-140. All numbers are
rounded to the nearest whole number.
KIRIS is the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System. |
The KIRIS report shows Lee Countys steady progress since
the 1994-95 school year and is further validation of the academic success of Lee County
students. The report shows:
- Dramatic improvement was made in reading, writing and social
studies; gains were made in mathematics and science.
- The Accountability Index of 57 in 1996-97 exceeded the
state-established improvement goal of 50 for Lee County.
- Lee Countys scores in 1996-97 met or exceeded Kentucky
statewide average scores in every area. (Kentucky averages are not shown in Table 7.)
Kentucky has over 200 school districts. Lee County ranked 15th
in its efforts to reach the reading baseline goal in 1997-98.
The KIRIS report also rates students levels of proficiency
in academic skills. "Novice" is the lowest level and "distinguished"
is the highest. More Lee County students in 1996-97 than in 1994-95 performed at the
"proficient" level or above, while fewer students performed at the
"novice" level. Teachers emphasis on reading and writing across the
curriculum appears to be paying off in better student performance. (See Table 8.)
Table 8
Academic Areas and Performance Levels
of Lee County Students
| Academic Area |
Percent
Novice 94-95 96-97 |
Percent
Apprentice 94-95 96-97 |
Percent
Proficient 94-95 96-97 |
Percent
Distinguished 94-95 96-97 |
| Reading Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
Writing |
26% 8% 36% 18%
10% 2%
25% 14%
73% 43% |
58% 39% 35% 55%
70% 76%
47% 48%
26% 47% |
16% 47% 23% 23%
19% 18%
25% 33%
1% 10% |
None 6% 6% 4%
1% 3%
4% 5%
None None |
| NOTE: Percentages are rounded to the
nearest whole number. |
THE VALUE OF BEING IN THE HSTW NETWORK
The principals of both schools consider High Schools That Work
a "vehicle that works" in restructuring high schools. Membership in HSTW
has given Lee County the impetus to change and a delivery system to make it happen. It has
also provided resources such as staff development, networking opportunities and materials.
The Kentucky reform effort has been another motivating factor. "The legislation said
we had to improve," Frank Kincaid said. "High Schools That Work, with its
10 key practices, has shown us how." The Kentucky Department of Education has done
its part by providing excellent support and leadership for Lee Countys efforts.
Advice to Other Schools
When asked what to recommend to others embarking on whole-school
improvement, both principals said: Make sure your school does what is best for students.
Other advice included:
- Dont implement High Schools That Work or any other
system without adapting it to meet local needs.
- Teachers will go along with changes if you emphasize what they
will mean to students.
- Help students understand the vision. They need to know why it is
important to work hard in high school.
- Dont give up. You cant change everything at once, and
you will always face obstacles. Consider them "additional opportunities."
CHALLENGES FOR THE FUTURE
In examining the countys progress and looking ahead to the
future, Lee County school leaders identified two major challenges:
- Overcoming losses in momentum due to frequent staff turnover. The
countys isolation from the rest of the state makes it difficult to keep quality
teachers. Young teachers move to larger school systems after they gain a little
experience. This creates an ongoing need to orient new teachers to HSTW and to
train them to work with other teachers and to use instructional approaches such as
project-based learning. School leaders are addressing this situation by naming resource
teachers to mentor and support new staff. Staff development provided by SREB, the state
and the local school district is essential to keep Lee County schools on track.
- Maintaining high achievement and continuing to make gains. Lee
County has made progress, but student achievement, particularly in mathematics and
science, is not where it needs to be. School leaders want all students to perform at a
high level and to acquire the skills they need.
Contact:
Glen Wilson
Superintendent
Lee County Schools
P.O. Box 668
Beattyville, KY 41311
phone: (606) 464-5000
fax: (606) 464-5009
e-mail: gwilson@lee.ky12.ky.us |
Sam Watkins
Principal
Lee County High School
P.O. Box 97
Beattyville, KY 41311
phone: (606) 464-5005
fax: (606) 464-5014
|
Frank Kincaid
Principal
Lee County Area Technology Center
P.O. Box B
Beattyville, KY 41311
phone: (606) 464-5018
fax: (606) 464-0663
e-mail: fkincaid@lee.k12.ky.us |
Southern Regional Education Board
High Schools That Work
592 10th St. N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30318
(98V46) Price: $1 each; 16 pages
For information on other HSTW publications, please see the
HSTW Materials List.
For information on other SREB publications, please see the Publications
Catalog.
To order a hard copy of this or any other SREB publication, email
publications@sreb.org
or call (404) 875-9211, Ext. 236. Please be sure to reference the
publication name and number.
|